Messages

Well, here are my thoughts about the whole thing:
 
- It's okay to do as many quests as you want, as long as you roleplay during, or between them.
 
- You can't roleplay in a quest you are doing for the 100th time as much as you did the first time.
 
- Pretending that antagonist chars should be antagonists right from the start, before they get enough lvls and decent equipment, is ridiculous. By enough levels I mean 6 or 7, depending on the char.
 
- Targetting monster pcs you know are low-level when they didn't attack you, before they are able to become a real challenge for you and apport something to the server, is lame. Yes, even if it's allowed and encouraged. That's my opinion.
 
That's all I can think of for now.

I don't see how robbing graves would be evil since you aren't hurting anyone. That would be chaotic, if anything. I believe a good aligned character could rob graves and be just fine.

Kind of... repetitive.

Why should Malar have the moon domain?

There are some situations which I find unclear whether it is exploiting or not.
 
For example, the gnoll quest's final room: is it okay to lure them all (not just the archers) into the corridor because it's narrow and because anyone with a minimum of intelligence who sees the runes on the ground can supect there can be traps? Are gnolls supposed not to fall to that kind of strategy and stay in the room, or could they be lured?

I didn't forget neutral. If he was neutral, he wouldn't give a rats ass one way or the other.

I wasn't talking about neutral referring to good and evil, but referring to law and chaos

since he wasn't lawful, he must have been chaotic.

You forget neutral.

Such a tax is considered lawful, but evil, Dr. Dragon. Its the right of a ruler to institute such laws. The guards, by upholding this tax to the letter of the law are supporting tyranny.
 
Stealing under such circumstances is still chaotic, but may be construed as 'good' depending on what it is used for.

1. Not every action has to be chaotic, or lawful or whatever. Imposing taxes has nothing to do with alignement. Anyone can do it. You don't have to be lawful or chaotic, but to be in a position of power where you can do so.
 
2. Not all rulers are lawful. I don't understand why this assumption is made. A ruler can be of ANY alignement (except maybe CG). His alignement only determines what he will do with his power: a LE baron will bleed his subjects white only if law allows him to, while a NG will respect or violate a law only if it benefits his subjects, while a NE / CE ruler will impose whatever he wants on his subjects.
 
3. Being lawful doesn't always mean you follow the laws of whatever place you are in.
 
4. Robin Hood type stealing isn't stealing, since he stole from people who had acquired this money unjustly.
 
5. This discussion is useless!

The Goblins of Gobsquat, while evil, are peaceful and do not threaten the Colony. Is it therefore a Chaotic Evil act to murder them based upon racial hatred? I believe most people would say, "No."
 
Yet, you're clearly killing a peaceful group because you hate them and so you can take their land and other stuff.

But they are still evil, so that means they don't attack the ziggurat most likely because they can't. Therefore, it wouldn't be evil to kill them.

Well, that sounds nice. Do we have to send an app to join?

I have most of your stuff. If you want it back, let me know.

When I defeat the first gladiator, Hofrus talks about me coming back and fighting more seasoned ones, but when I take the quest again, the same gladiator shows up.