wcsherry
2006-09-20 02:11:07 UTC
#41728
Prices seem to be a bit exorbitant for wands. Two that caught my eye today were 2nd circle clerical spells:
3600 for Darkness
3600 for Holding
when compared to less than 1/3 of the price for a Wand of Invisibility. I know it might not be as important as some other bug fixes, but I figured I'd bring this up and put it in the foreground regardless for consideration.
Harlstar
2006-09-20 02:20:02 UTC
#41731
yeah, more wands for the people!
Arkov
2006-09-20 08:40:09 UTC
#41802
This is an issue for any spell which can't be made into a potion.
I agree, it should be fixed -- though to be fair, some of those wands are pretty darn useful and should remain expensive.
Efu_Darkness2
2006-09-20 09:13:09 UTC
#41804
I thought they where deliberatly expensive, beacuse they are so good?
MadCaddies
2006-09-20 10:14:32 UTC
#41808
Despite it being a bug that is affecting thir pricing, I think the prices themselves are quite alright. 3500 gold for 25 charges or Hold of Blindness/Deafness is pretty good!
Anthee
2006-09-20 18:01:19 UTC
#41859
MadCaddies
Despite it being a bug that is affecting thir pricing, I think the prices themselves are quite alright. 3500 gold for 25 charges or Hold of Blindness/Deafness is pretty good!
Eh, no. No, it isn't.
You can scribe 25 scrolls of Hold Person or Blindness/Deafness for about the same price (I think), which is silly. The only difference is that they're separate items and the UMD DC is higher.
Howland
2006-09-20 18:14:16 UTC
#41862
I would definitely like to make some major adjustments to wand prices.
Arkov
2006-09-30 23:33:22 UTC
#43858
Howland and the other balance-conscious DMs are hard at work making a long list of wand and potion prices for me, I think. Once I get that, I can begin fixing this up.
Arkov
2006-10-12 08:58:11 UTC
#46308
This was fixed a few days ago.