Home > Letters and Notes

Donrick, Sunellar, Merrickson

Dear sir,

I'm still seeking a place to allocate your vote, so I've decided to write to inquire about your stance on a number of issues, notably:

    The Seekers and their pursuit of the surface v. the erection of permanent government in Dunwarren proper.

    Relations between Upper and Lower, and what role said districts should have in enforcing crime in the other.

    The role of Etorix in the defense of Dunwarren, as well as what relationship our settlement should have with the serpent.

    Laws concerning 'slaver races' writing Upper and Lower, specifically the races under which most residents toiled during their time in bondage, and what your position is on trading with them if need be.

    What the best sort of government in Sanctuary would consist of.

    The role of the Spellguard in Sanctuary’s defense, as well as the Selena Tower’s long history of obscuring information from the Council.

If you’d like to meet and discuss the importance of these issues, I would certainly appreciate it. Platitudes are unbecoming (and ultimately quite disappointing), so I urge you to search your soul and respond informally and honestly.

Sincerely,

Alistair Orsiri Last Stand, Room Four

Alistair,

The Seekers and their pursuit of the surface v. the erection of permanent government in Dunwarren proper.

The Seekers as a group are comprised of whimsical, disloyal dilettantes who seem perfectly willing to ignore any sense of responsibility, duty, or allegiance when it is no longer convenient for them. Their decision to reside within Lower Sanctuary and abandon Upper Sanctuary is the final blow in their complete and utter abrogation of any sense of responsibility and faith they might be offered by the Council. What they choose to do on their own is their provenance, but any official support for their activities from the Council should not be forthcoming, as they have proven themselves unable to fulfill the requirements and mandates of such support.

As for their desire to reach the surface, that is their choice to pursue, and I would commend any citizens who have the drive and the initiative to seek out a path to the surface. That being said, however, the role of the Council and the government of Sanctuary should be to provide for the governance, the safety, and the defense of this city-not to attempt to recklessly and blindly pursue a path to the surface that most of its citizens could not survive, were it to be discovered. Given further the fact that discoveries of surface routes appear to be largely fortuitous and based upon the whims of Lady Luck, there is no place for the focus of Sanctuary's government to be on searching for such a route. Specific support and sanction may be offered to individuals who are seeking such, but the primary focus of the Council should always be on providing for Sanctuary and her people within.

Relations between Upper and Lower, and what role said districts should have in enforcing crime in the other.

Lower Sanctuary is not a unified settlement, but rather is a loose collection of fragmented, disparate, and largely criminal or rebellious elements. It does not deserve recognition as any sort of legitimate government, because it most certainly is not-it is a state of utter reckless anarchy. Upper Sanctuary does not have the means to pacify this anarchy, and as such, should not involve itself in any efforts to maintain governance over the settlement below. The Council may be wise to endorse and covertly support initiatives to bring peace and a sense of structure to the settlements below, however, if only to prevent them from spawning so many criminal dissidents.

Lower Sanctuary has no established courts, laws, or law enforcers; Upper Sanctuary does. People of Lower attempting to "enforce laws" in Upper Sanctuary would be criminals, and would be dealt with as such. Upper Sanctuary does, however, have an established system of courts, laws, and law enforcers, which has the support of her people; any criminals who commit crimes in Upper and flee to cower in Lower will be pursued and brought to justice, and any criminals who commit crimes in Lower and deign to enter Upper will be arrested and tried for their crimes. Upper Sanctuary is a lawful society, and should never allow criminals from below to seek refuge within it-or allow criminals to avoid justice by cowering below.

The role of Etorix in the defense of Dunwarren, as well as what relationship our settlement should have with the serpent.

The Shadow Wyrm is a petty, savage beast playing at immortality and divinity-and failing. He has no role in the defense of Dunwarren, and Sanctuary should have no relations with a settlement of monstrous, slaving kobolds who have demanded the deaths of our citizens and attempted to exploit us for their own gain numerous times in the past. He wishes to corrupt the people of Sanctuary to his ways to obtain that which is beyond his reach, and to believe that there is any protection in the embrace of a dark, fickle creature such as he is folly, and should never be countenanced.

Laws concerning 'slaver races' writing Upper and Lower, specifically the races under which most residents toiled during their time in bondage, and what your position is on trading with them if need be.

Monstrous, slaver races have no place in this settlement of freedom. By their very nature, they are intrinsically dark and corrupt; they are incapable of living amongst us in freedom and peace, and it is folly to think otherwise for the hope of some transient gain by trade with them. Trade with slavers should never be allowed, for Sanctuary has risked much for her freedom, and insulting her people and her beliefs by sacrificing the sanctity of her people for a trade agreement that would provide slavers the coin to harm countless more individuals cannot be allowed. Sanctuary was created by the fiery vision of the Bresleys, who fought against their oppressors-they did not bargain with the Drow for their freedom and the right to live, and so Sanctuary should not.

What the best sort of government in Sanctuary would consist of.

A Council composed of talented, dynamic, righteous, law-abiding members, who did not shirk their duties or insist on endlessly debating ideas while demonstrating the utter inability to come to a decision. In short, capable, upright leaders-not pretentious dilettantes.

The role of the Spellguard in Sanctuary’s defense, as well as the Selena Tower’s long history of obscuring information from the Council.

The Spellguard's Agents have repeatedly demonstrated a flagrant disregard for the laws of Sanctuary and the proper enforcement of their duties. The Spellguard have a place within Sanctuary's defense, but they must be monitored closely to ensure that they do not continue the tradition of corruption and malfeasance that is apparently the hallmark of their Order's Agents. Any abuse of their powers cannot and will not be tolerated, and any efforts by the Spellguard to obfuscate the improper activities of their Agents must likewise be dealt with harshly. They have a chance to prove they are more than simply an elitist order of mages; should they fail in that regard, there must be consequences.

~V.S.

Citizen Orsiri,

Thank you for your inquiry! My answers are below, and I am glad that you asked. The Seekers and their pursuit of the surface v. the erection of permanent government in Dunwarren proper.

The Seekers have shirked their duties, as set before them by the government of Upper. If they wish to continue in whatever it is they truly do, I shall not oppose them so long as their aims are worthy. However, it does not benefit anyone to conduct matters with an imminent escape in mind. It simply will not be condusive to good decision making.

Relations between Upper and Lower, and what role said districts should have in enforcing crime in the other.

Lower needs to organize itself into some sort of settlement which can be listened to. As of right now, there is no way to enforce the wishes of Lower, because there is no unified statement on what they are. Once Lower unifies, and puts forth their wishes and desires, I for one would be willing to discuss them with them.

The role of Etorix in the defense of Dunwarren, as well as what relationship our settlement should have with the serpent.

Etorix shall have no role in Sanctuary, if I am to have my way. We have no need of his aid, any more than we do the aid of Traensyr, Ysinode, or Chazbash. I have no intention of allowing any deals at all to be brokered with this Dragon, or his servants. Laws concerning 'slaver races' writing Upper and Lower, specifically the races under which most residents toiled during their time in bondage, and what your position is on trading with them if need be. As stated above, I have no intention of dealing with Slavers, or races who show themselves to be of ill intent to Man and his Freedom. I cannot imagine any situation in which the people of Sanctuary would be better for dealing with Drow, Beholders, Illithids or Duergar. We've no need of their aid, any more than we do of their whips.

What the best sort of government in Sanctuary would consist of.

I make no secret that I am a man from Cormyr, and as such, I am a man who believes firmly in Monarchy. I believe a benevolent King to be the truest, and best form of government. However, during my time here, I have come to understand why this does not serve the people of Sanctuary best, and as such I can only pursue what I feel does-

A Council they have elected, which acts with only their best interests in mind. It would operate effectively, and without inane acts of decadence as have been seen in the past. Needless bureacracy must be eschewed. The role of the Spellguard in Sanctuary’s defense, as well as the Selena Tower’s long history of obscuring information from the Council.

The Spellguard should be charged with maintaining our wards, and our defenses in so far as animatrons and magical attacks are concerned. They do not require the ability to arrest and detain, nor interrogate our citizens to complete the duties necessary of them. I intend to see their powers limited, and that they are watched more carefully than they have been in the past.

If you have further questions, do not hesitate to ask.

-Sir Leonard Merrickson